Anonymous

Looking for Bra and Louvre

The all purpose forum for any TR7/8 related topics.
Post Reply
Stevie P
Rust Hunter
Posts: 222
Joined: 23 Sep 2013 06:29
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Looking for Bra and Louvre

Postby Stevie P » 13 Jan 2014 18:36

Not the Mrs' smalls, but for my FHC.

Bra for the front to protect from chips and Louvre for rear screen.

http://www.rimmerbros.co.uk/Item--i-RB7300

Anyone know who still makes / stocks them?

Cheers,

Steve

FI Spyder
TRemendous
Posts: 8917
Joined: 03 Jul 2006 19:54
Location: Canada

Postby FI Spyder » 13 Jan 2014 18:46

While it will protect from chips I believe the consensus is that they trap moisture and are hard on the paint job not to mention they ruin the lines of the car. I just put a dab of paint on the chip. Now that's my personal opinion and others may vary. What's your point of view?

- - -TR7 Spider - - - 1978 Spitfire- - - - 1976 Spitfire - - 1988 Tercel 4X4 - Kali on Integra - 1991 Integra - Yellow TCT
Image

rgsSpider
Wedge Pilot
Posts: 434
Joined: 30 Jul 2011 04:57
Location: USA
Contact:

Postby rgsSpider » 13 Jan 2014 19:10

Yes please don't do the bra! Dirt and grit get trapped between the bra and your paint and as the bra moves as you drive it acts like sand paper against your paint. I used to like them as a kid until I saw what it was doing to my car.

Randy

1980 TR7 <font color="red">Spider!</font id="red">
Image Image Image http://rgstr7spider.tumblr.com/

trekcarbonboy
Swagester
Posts: 940
Joined: 18 Oct 2010 15:38
Location: USA

Postby trekcarbonboy » 13 Jan 2014 20:05

Awful looking things those bras are...
I'd rather just use touch-up myself.

Use this if you really need some kind of protection.

http://www.amazon.com/Clear-Paint-Prote ... B004VG88MQ

Craig '75 2.0 FHC
ImageImage

gaz
TRemendous
Posts: 2441
Joined: 12 Jan 2004 19:16
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Postby gaz » 13 Jan 2014 21:22

I know there's a lot of negativity about car bra's and for good reasons, but myself I do like period accessories.....

Image

Here's some louvre's for ya...

Image

www.classiccarrunblackpool.co.uk

1981 DHC 2.0 Litre
1980 DHC pedal car
1982 DHC TR-ailer in the making


ImageImageImageImage

silverseven
TRemendous
Posts: 4451
Joined: 11 Dec 2003 23:44
Location: Canada
Contact:

Postby silverseven » 14 Jan 2014 00:25

if a bra is installed correctly and not left on the car when wet it should not damage the paint. I used to have them on a few of my previous cars and never had an issue with the paint ...even on a dark blue.

Ron.
ImageImageImage

Cobber
TRemendous
Posts: 2486
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 10:03
Location: Australia
Contact:

Postby Cobber » 14 Jan 2014 01:28

Car Bra on a TR........ looks like a TR in a bloody gimp suit! [:D]
Reminds of something like this:
Image

"Keep calm, relax, focus on the problem & PULL THE BLOODY TRIGGER"

80'Triumph TR7, 73'Land Rover (Ford 351. V8),
'89 Ford Fairlane
'98 MG-F, 69'Ford F250.
76' Ford F100

john 215
TRemendous
Posts: 6867
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 17:12
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Postby john 215 » 14 Jan 2014 05:05

Hi,

Cobber, Someone says bra to me and a totally different images enter my head ! Thank God [:p]

Paul on here found his louvre's at a auto jumble, sure on Robsports stand, but a rare accessory. With Gaz, like to see period stuff on our cars.

Image


Image


May be worth an email to S & S Prep and Robsport, you never know what they may have laying around.

http://www.ss-preparations.co.uk/

http://www.ss-preparations.co.uk/

Cheers John


ImageImageImage Image
LIVE LIFE A QUARTER OF A MILE AT A TIME!

1976 Speke FHC Beauty Now with an overdrive conversion

1979 3.5 FHC(STATUS PENDING!!)

1982 2.0 DHC NOW A 4.6, BUILT NOT BROUGHT !!!!

tr7sprint1
Swagester
Posts: 528
Joined: 18 Nov 2006 12:45
Location: USA
Contact:

Postby tr7sprint1 » 14 Jan 2014 10:40

I have a louver without mounting hardware and a bra available for sell.

Cheap!!!

<b>"GETTING SPEED OUT OF A LOW POWERED CAR IS OFTEN MORE REWARDING, THAN WITH TIRE-SMOKING BRUTES" </b>
<h4><center>http://cliffstr7sprintconversion.blogspot.com/</center></h4>

Odd
TRiffic
Posts: 1969
Joined: 19 Oct 2007 08:49
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Postby Odd » 14 Jan 2014 12:37

Personally I prefer the Triumph International =http://tinyurl.com/naebcgm versions - they do improve the front look... [^]
The Triumph car version - makes a nice front look butt ugly! As we've seen in Gaz's earlier picture... [xx(]
YMMV JMHO ...

Stevie P
Rust Hunter
Posts: 222
Joined: 23 Sep 2013 06:29
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Postby Stevie P » 14 Jan 2014 17:40

Odd

do you have any pictures to show what you mean?

Thanks,

Steve

Hasbeen
TRemendous
Posts: 6474
Joined: 28 Apr 2005 12:32
Location: Australia
Contact:

Postby Hasbeen » 14 Jan 2014 22:37

Stop being mean, repaint the thing, using some decent paint.

With the first paint job on my current 7 I actually recorded touching up 146 paint chips, over about 7 years, before giving up. That was a respray over existing paint.

I finally bit the bullet, & had a full 2 pack & clear bare metal paint job about 18 months back, & have not had a stone chip since.

Hasbeen

Beans
TRemendous
Posts: 7795
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 19:29
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Postby Beans » 15 Jan 2014 08:33

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Century Gothic, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Odd</i>

Personally I prefer the Triumph International versions ...
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
I fully agree there [:D]

Image

<center>Image
<font color="blue"><i>1976 TR7 FHC (needs some TLC ...)
1980 TR7 DHC (my first car, a.k.a. Kermette)
1981 TR7 FHC (Sprint engined a.k.a. 't Kreng
</font id="blue"><b>[url="http://www.tr7beans.blogspot.com/"]<u><b><font size="3"><font color="red">My full Weblog</font id="red"></font id="size3"></b></u>[/url]</b></i></center>

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 313 guests

cron