Anonymous

Metal bumper inserts

The all purpose forum for any TR7/8 related topics.
Post Reply
Bobbieslandy
Wedgista
Posts: 1471
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 18:52
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Metal bumper inserts

Postby Bobbieslandy » 15 Jul 2010 18:07

Has anyone removed the metal bumper inserts (or modified them) to make things a little bit lighter?

Is it that noticable and is it worth doing? i do appreciate the safety aspects............

Rob.

ImageImageImage

nick
TRiffic
Posts: 1679
Joined: 07 Apr 2005 02:00
Location: USA
Contact:

Postby nick » 15 Jul 2010 18:47

Remove the bumper. Remove enough of the bumper cover fasteners to allow the peeling back of the cover on the bumper ends. I think it takes and allen wrench to remove the two bolts. They are about 10 lbs each.
I have not noticed anything adverse after the removal. I took them out to save the weight and to help with the bumper sag.

Image
nick
'79 TR7

Beans
TRemendous
Posts: 7795
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 19:29
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Postby Beans » 15 Jul 2010 19:27

FHC doesn't have the cast iron balance weights [;)]

If you are not going to hit anything head on [}:)] you might remove the steel bar and replace it with some alloy brackets.
Have a look at Bryce's weblog on the CT site, he did quite a neat job.

Probably safer to drill the the bumper bar to shed some weight.

<center>Image
<font color="blue"><i>1980 TR7 DHC (my first car, now restored and back on the road)
1981 TR7 FHC Sprint (better known as 't Kreng)</font id="blue">
<b>[url="http://www.tr7beans.blogspot.com/"]<u><b><font size="2"><font color="red">My Weblog</font id="red"></font id="size2"></b></u>[/url]</b></i></center>

manwithtool
Rust Hunter
Posts: 134
Joined: 14 May 2007 12:25
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Postby manwithtool » 15 Jul 2010 20:46

removed mine.....never did quite inderstand the purpose of the stupid things other than to make the rubber mounts sag ?



If it isn't broken, I can still fix it

Beans
TRemendous
Posts: 7795
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 19:29
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Postby Beans » 15 Jul 2010 20:55

FHC's don't have the rubber mounts or balance weights [:p]

<center>Image
<font color="blue"><i>1980 TR7 DHC (my first car, now restored and back on the road)
1981 TR7 FHC Sprint (better known as 't Kreng)</font id="blue">
<b>[url="http://www.tr7beans.blogspot.com/"]<u><b><font size="2"><font color="red">My Weblog</font id="red"></font id="size2"></b></u>[/url]</b></i></center>

FI Spyder
TRemendous
Posts: 8917
Joined: 03 Jul 2006 19:54
Location: Canada

Postby FI Spyder » 15 Jul 2010 21:36

I took out my bumper weights when I had the bumper off just to see as I didn't have any bumper droop. Didn't notice any difference in scuttle shake or acceleration. Not worth the trouble to do it unless you're planning to enter F1 as 13th team where every gram counts.

Less trouble to leave the wife at home and leave the weights in. [:D]


TR7 Spider - 1978 Spifire - 1976 Spitfire - 1988 Tercel 4X4 - Kali on Integra - 1991 Integra
Image

V8Wedgehead
Swagester
Posts: 971
Joined: 27 May 2008 22:30
Location: USA
Contact:

Postby V8Wedgehead » 15 Jul 2010 23:21

I am going to be cutting holes in my bumper frames to lose some wieght. I also will have a hole in the front bumper frame to let more air to the radiator.

Michael
1980 TR8 FHC #0020 Rally Conversion
Image

Johnluss
Rust Hunter
Posts: 123
Joined: 04 Oct 2003 21:11
Location: Canada
Contact:

Postby Johnluss » 16 Jul 2010 02:10

I have removed mine a few years back. Did not notice any difference.

Hasbeen
TRemendous
Posts: 6474
Joined: 28 Apr 2005 12:32
Location: Australia
Contact:

Postby Hasbeen » 16 Jul 2010 03:08

We removed our weights some time back, with no obvious change.

Interestingly, I have driven a number of newer, more modern
convertibles recently, & found almost all of them suffer much more
scuttle shake than the 8 DHC.

It really is hard to get anything better than our old things at any
where near an affordable price.

Perhaps that motto should be "the shape things better than things to
come" in more areas than one.

Hasbeen

Bobbieslandy
Wedgista
Posts: 1471
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 18:52
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Postby Bobbieslandy » 17 Jul 2010 11:05

Some interesting info there, i think i'll be leaving mine in if only for the safety aspect than anything else.

Thanks for the input chaps,

Rob.

ImageImageImage

prlee
Swagester
Posts: 504
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 19:55
Location: United Kingdom

Postby prlee » 17 Jul 2010 19:55

Just removed the weights from my DHC front bumper (car mostly original), fitted solid mounts as one was disintegrating. Not got it back on the road yet though.

Beans is right, they were only fitted to the DHC to reduce scuttle shake.

Pete
81 DHC (Undergoing minor body repair)
79 Spitfire (Current Main drive)
Image Image Image

bmcecosse
TRemendous
Posts: 2399
Joined: 14 Apr 2007 21:54
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Postby bmcecosse » 17 Jul 2010 19:59

Where's the 'safety aspect' ?????? These weights were 'supposedly' computer designed harmonic balancers intended (with the rubber mounts) to reduce scuttle shake on the open top cars - hence reason the FHC doesn't have/need them. I took mine out last year - to reduce the dreaded 'droop' - and yes -I would say there IS now a bit more 'scuttle shake' - but not the slightest reduction in safety! I won't be refitting mine.

Image Image ImageImage

Bobbieslandy
Wedgista
Posts: 1471
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 18:52
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Postby Bobbieslandy » 17 Jul 2010 20:53

I think we're talking about two different things. i bought a second hand bumper a few years back and noticed how heavy it was when i was putting it up into the garage loft. the idea was to remove the whole metal "girder" behind the plastic outers and refit the plastic outers by using some fabbed up brackets. I'm not aware of the "weights" as i haven't looked at them that closely. When i was reffering to safety i was talking about driving into another car. or wall. As if some "weights" would make a difference[:D] Sorry if it caused any confusion.

ImageImageImage

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 347 guests