Postby Cobber » 26 Jun 2010 04:00
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Century Gothic, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Cobber</i>
<font size="2"><font face="Comic Sans MS">Ahhh well where do I start?
That boot lid is bloody awful, Spare tyre bulges on boot lids belong on Lincoln Continentals where they still look awful but at least suit the style sentiment of the car.
The bloody roof is bloody hideous it looks like it belongs on one of those unconvincing faux 30's kitcars ( you know the type that uses body components like doors of the modern doner car).
Other things like the bottoms of the rear flares, the grill, the power bulge and the front air dam are at best just very poor amateur efforts.
The paintwork looks like crap acrylic (Dulon A type or similar rubbish).
The interior decor is best described as early 70's bordello style!
I don't have a problem with the concept of the Ford V8 conversion, but if the design and workmanship is on the same standard as the body I'd be real worried!
Altogether very pimpmoblie, all you would need to go with it is a diamond stud in the front tooth, a shit load of gold bling, leopard skin pants, blue velvet jacket with wide lapels, a red satin shirt unbuttoned to the waist and a green felt hat!</font id="Comic Sans MS"></font id="size2">
80'Triumph TR7, , 73'Land Rover (Ford 351. V8),
'89 Ford Fairlane
85'Alfa 90, 69'Ford F250.
76' Ford F100
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
80'Triumph TR7, , 73'Land Rover (Ford 351. V8),
'89 Ford Fairlane
85'Alfa 90, 69'Ford F250.
76' Ford F100